Today, his feast as a beatus (which, while popular in origin--he was canonized by someone who turned out to be an antipope--was tolerated and perhaps even confirmed by Benedict XIV and, while presumably not infallible in the manner of modern canonizations, is of sturdier legal provenance than saints like Bl. Christina the Astonishing, never officially canonized or even beatified) is celebrated at Aachen. [UPDATE: It appears he is celebrated at Aachen and Frankfurt as St. Charlemagne, not beatus, though in nearly every reference book I have seen lists him as Blessed, perhaps based on the privaye opinion of Benedict XIV. See comments.] For all his private faults, he was a great and Christian ruler--this man pretty much invented Europe, when you get down to it, though in a rather different form than we know it today. Aptly, or perhaps ironically, The Economist's column on the goings-on of EU diplomats in Brussels is named in his honor.
From the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913 edition):
While enough has been said above to show how ready he was to interfere in the Church's domain, it does not appear that this propensity arose from motives discreditable to his religious character. It would be absurd to pretend that Charlemagne was a consistent lifelong hypocrite; if he was not, then his keen practical interest in all that pertained to the services of the Church, his participation even in the chanting of the choir (though, as his biographer says, "in a subdued voice") his fastidious attention to questions of rites and ceremonies (Monachus Sangallensis), go to show, like many other traits related of him, that his strong rough nature was really impregnated with zeal, however mistaken at times, for the earthly glory of God. He sought to elevate and perfect the clergy, both monastic and secular, the latter through the enforcement of the Vita Canonica or common life. Tithes were strictly enforced for the support of the clergy and the dignity of public worship. Ecclesiastical immunities were recognized and protected, the bishops held to frequent visitation of their dioceses, a regular religious instruction of the people provided for, and in the vernacular tongue. Through Alcuin he caused corrected copies of the Scripture to be placed in the churches, and earned great credit for his improvement of the much depraved text of the Latin Vulgate. [...]From Einhard, Vita Karoli Magni (c. 817-833), Chapter 27:
From boyhood Charles had evinced strong domestic affections. Judged, perhaps, by the more perfectly developed Christian standards of a later day, his matrimonial relations were far from blameless; but it would be unfair to criticize by any such ethical rules the obscurely transmitted accounts of his domestic life which have come down to us. What is certain (and more pleasant to contemplate) is the picture, which his contemporaries have left us, of the delight he found in being with his children, joining in their sports, particularly in his own favourite recreation of swimming, and finding his relaxation in the society of his sons and daughters; the latter he refused to give in marriage, unfortunately for their moral character. He died in his seventy-second year, after forty-seven years of reign, and was buried in the octagonal Byzantine-Romanesque church at Aachen, built by him and decorated with marble columns from Rome and Ravenna. In the year 1000 Otto III opened the imperial tomb and found (it is said) the great emperor as he had been buried, sitting on a marble throne, robed and crowned as in life, the book of the Gospels open on his knees. In some parts of the empire popular affection placed him among the saints. For political purposes and to please Frederick Barbarossa he was canonized (1165) by the antipope Paschal III, but this act was never ratified by insertion of his feast in the Roman Breviary or by the Universal Church; his cultus, however, was permitted at Aachen [Acta SS., 28 Jan., 3d ed., II, 490-93, 303-7, 769; his office is in Canisius, "Antiq. Lect.", III (2)]. [...] Except on his visits to Rome he wore the national dress of his Frankish people, linen shirt and drawers, a tunic held by a silken cord, and leggings; his thighs were wound round with thongs of leather; his feet were covered with laced shoes. He had good health to his sixty-eighth year, when fevers set in, and he began to limp with one foot.
He was heavily built, sturdy, and of considerable stature, although not exceptionally so, since his height was seven times the length of his own foot. He had a round head, large and lively eyes, a slightly larger nose than usual, white but still attractive hair, a bright and cheerful expression, a short and fat neck, and a slightly protruding stomach. His voice was clear, but a little higher than one would have expected for a man of his build. He enjoyed good health, except for the fevers that affected him in the last few years of his life. Toward the end he dragged one leg. Even then, he stubbornly did what he wanted and refused to listen to doctors, indeed he detested them, because they wanted to persuade him to stop eating roast meat, as was his wont, and to be content with boiled meat.From Wikipedia:
The physical portrait provided by Einhard is confirmed by contemporary depictions of the emperor, such as coins and his 8-inch bronze statue kept in the Louvre. [His] description of Charlemagne's height (6 feet 4 inches, or 193 centimeters) was not far off. Though it was Herculean stature, particularly in a period in which people were a little shorter than most today, archaeology has confirmed his tallness: in 1861, Charlemagne's tomb was opened by scientists who reconstructed his skeleton and found that it indeed measured 74.9 inches (190 centimeters).
While his cult is only tolerated, where it *is* tolerated, he is venerated as a Saint (Sanctus Carolus). In Aix-la-chapelle, there is a solemn Mass on his feast day (which is a Solemnity there, St. Thomas Aquinas is bumped to 29 January), this year celebrated by Msgr. Brandmüller, the President emeritus of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences. For the external solemnity this coming Sunday, Pontifical Mass (in Latin, if you can believe it) will be celebrated by the President of the German Bishops' Conf., Abp. Zollitsch of Freiburg. There is an entire medieval office of St. Charles which will be sung, and the high point of the Mass is the sequentia S. Karoli:
ReplyDeleteUrbs Aquensis , urbs regalis, (in Frankfurt, where the Mass of St. Charles is also celebrated, they sing "Francfordensis urbs regalis")
regni sedes principalis,
prima regum curia.
Regi regum pange laudes,
quae de magni regis gaudes
Caroli praesentia.
Iste coetus psallat laetus,
psallat chorus hic sonorus,
vocali concordia.
At dum manus operatur,
bonum quod cor meditatur,
dulcis est psalmodia.
Hac in die, die festa,
magni regis magna gesta,
recolat Ecclesia,
reges terrae et omnes populi,
omnes simul plaudant et singuli,
celebri laetitia.
Hic est magnus imperator,
boni fructus bonus sator,
et prudens agricola,
infideles hic convertit,
fana, deos hic evertit
et confringit idola.
Hic superbos domat reges,
hic regnare sacras leges
facit cum justitia.
Quam tuetur eo fine
ut et justus sed nec sine
sit misericordia.
Stella maris, o Maria,
mundi salus, vitae via,
alma nostra Domina.
Vacillantum rege gressus
et ad regem des accessus
in perenni gloria.
Christe splendor Dei patris
incorruptae fili matris
gentem tuam adjuva.
Per hunc sanctum, cuius festa
celebramus, nobis praesta
sempiterna gaudia.
I had thought about putting together a post for the NLM, but didn't have the time to get around to actually doing it properly.
That is extremely interesting--all the books I have seen list him as a beatus, presumably due to whatever ruling (or private judgement, it's unclear to me) was made by Benedict XVI. It's pretty clear to me that his cultus in the Middle Ages was certainly that of a saint (of course the line between saint and blessed was not always well-defined then in the popular mind) so it is interesting to see that this has persisted organically in Aachen. Thanks also for the sequence text--it is quite wonderful to see that this is still being done there!
ReplyDeleteThere is an abundance of Proper Masses/Offices (more strictly Proper Collects for the Masses) for him in local Propriums, though somewhat surprisingly, the lessons are similar for the larger part.
ReplyDelete__________________________
1. Deus, qui de cura temporalis regiminis beatum Carolum ad regni coelestis curiam transtulisti: concede propitious; ut cuius solemnia celebramus, eius apud patrociniis adiuvemur. Per Dominum.
2. Deus, qui beatum Carolum Confessorem tuum de terreno regno ad coelestis regni gloriam transtulisti: eius quaesumus meritis et intercession Regis regum Iesu Chrisi Filii tui facias nos esse consortes. Per eumdem Dominum.
3. Omnipotens et misericors Deus, qui a gloria tua nullam conditionem excludis: te suppliciter exoramus, ut, sicut beato Carolo Confessori tuo post terrni culen imperii, coelestis regni solium contulisti; ita meritis eius et precibus nobis quoque famulis tuis aeternae felicitates praemia largiaris. Per Dominum
4. Largite Domine famuli tuis praemia foelicitatis aeterne intercedente Beato Carolo Confessore tuo, cui post terreni culmen imperii celestis regni solium contulisti. Per Dominum.
Question here: I assume "Beato/um" in this case is used in the sense that it is applied to saints in the old mass, who are also called blessed this and blessed that, yes? (What language does an EF mass of a beatus use?)
ReplyDeleteHmmmm...interesting. The Propriums themselves style Charlemagne variously as "S." or "B.". But going by Masses such as those for England, I cannot see a difference in the use of "blessed" which seems to be applied broadly to both categories.
ReplyDeleteGiven the marriage laws of the Franks, Charlemagne's refusal to let his daughters marry out per Roman law is understandable. Their "illicit" relationships were perfectly legal and okey-dokey marriages from the Frankish standpoint, and avoided the brideprice problem. His daughters were of such high status that it was easier to take the low-status men they liked into the clan to live, rather than make them pay brideprice. The informality was actually part of the law in such cases; a formal marriage required money to change hands and legal agreements to be made, whereas riding off with a lady (with her clan's consent) was free.
ReplyDeleteHis daughters weren't just company for Charlemagne, either. Educated Frankish women were an important resource for their menfolk, who had to concentrate more on fighting. They were the physicians and the books of lore, and they ran the house and the farms. It's more likely that Charlemagne needed them to keep court running, and/or didn't want other families to get the benefit of their expertise. (Not to mention inducing pretensions to the throne in their offspring.)
Charlemagne's various wives of various Frankish legal statuses were a similar case, though he really didn't do right by the Lombard lady. Basically, any high status lady he married was for politics, whereas low status women were about love or skills. There's usually not much overlap, either; he was usually burying one or sending one home before taking on another. Lots of brideprice involved, too.
The Church was dead right to try to get people to marry along Christian lines, not Frankish ones. But it's not useful to interpret what was going on at Charlemagne's court by the marriage laws and customs of other days.
Interesting and informative--thanks for helping us sort out those things. I suppose it is good to remind us that northern Europe was still only recently-converted, at least with regards to some of its habits... I am glad to hear there was not much overlap, though. Ultimately, though, it comes down to a holy death; and it is good to know God and penitence can sort out the rest.
ReplyDelete